Meanwhile, men claimed, on average, £3,300.
The difference can be explained by self-employed women’s generally lower earnings compared to self-employed men, the Women’s Budget Group said.
The analysis was carried out by the Local Data Project led by the Women’s Budget Group, and it is part of wider research looking at the gender differences both nationally and locally in accessing coronavirus Government support – including SEISS and the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (known as the furlough scheme).
Young women aged 18 to 25 are the largest group to be furloughed by age and gender.
Data shows 24 percent of young women workers (425,300) have been furloughed compared to 20 percent of young men (345,100).
In terms of those under the age of 18, 40 percent of young women have been furloughed compared to 30 percent of young men.
Overall, the figures show women are more likely than men to have been furloughed.
In fact, 52.1 percent of women have been furloughed, despite women only making up 47.3 percent of the overall UK workforce.
By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared to 2,144,700 men.
Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson, Director of the UK Women’s Budget Group said: “Our gendered analysis of the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) highlights how the government has failed to consider the employment situation for women.
“The IFS finds that approximately 1.3 million people will be ineligible for SEISS because less than half their income comes from self-employment.
“As the majority of self-employed women are part-time, this has put them at greater risk of being excluded from the Government’s self-employed support package.
“Overall, our analysis finds that women in general and young women in particular have been furloughed at higher levels which places them at greater risk of redundancy once the furlough scheme ends in September.
“But the Government’s plans to ‘build back better’ focus largely on construction projects, which are more likely to create jobs for men.
“Our work has shown that investment in care could create nearly three times as many jobs as the same amount of money invested in construction.
“A care-led recovery would create more jobs for men, and many more for women, who are at greater risk of redundancy.”