“The volume is famous for depicting the Sphinx for the first time without its nose and in a realistic style.
“But for fringe historians, the volume is also interesting because of the mistakes Norden made.
“In 1757, Norden’s text was translated into English and published under the title ‘Travels in Egypt & Nubia’.
“In the translation, Norden describes the so-called Black Pyramid, which he calls the ‘fourth’ pyramid, ‘almost on a diagonal line’ with the other three.”
The book records Norden’s extensive documentation of his voyage through Egypt and it contains some of the very first realistic drawings of Egyptian monuments.
But one of these depictions appears to show four “Great Pyramids” and his description of the Giza Plateau is different from what is seen today.
His account reads: “The fourth pyramid is a hundred feet lower than the third.
“It is like the others, uncovered without, is shut, but hath no temple like the first.
“The ruined satellite pyramid, in the form of a step-pyramid, ends in a cube, while the easternmost one could be said to resemble rubble, the “great heap” Norden describes.
“Given that he was also pretty bad at estimating heights, to judge by his estimates of known objects, so closely does this hypothesis fit that it seems unlikely that any other solution would work as well. ”
Despite this, the author said there was one more thing that did not add up.
He continued: “However, we are left with one baffling question, which Colonel Vyse noted: ‘Mr Norden has entirely overlooked the two [satellite] pyramids’.
“Might they have been partially buried in the sand? I’m afraid I don’t have the answer to how Norden missed two pyramids.”